UN Security Council Veto Power
Q: Should the permanent members of the Security Council continue to retain their veto power? Why or why not?
It really depends on the situation that the UN may face, like they may face a decision where the whole world will be made to candy, and if the UN say yes to that then everybody in the whole world who loves candy and those who havent’ tasted candy will immediatly start eating; soon the whole place will be full of young or old people getting fat and soon having heart diseases and not only people animals too because some animals aren’t allowed certain types of food will either give them some sort of serious disease or die from whatever ingredients in the candies. But if they say no then all that wouldn’t have happened to those people and animals.
Also another example if some king from a country or state had a fight with another country or state and that other queen fought back and decided that her country is not to have anyone seling thier products and traveling there the king of that country may lose alot of tourist attraction and products from other countries which may make the king angry and plan a world war 3 and if the UN agrees with this ( maybe because some curious person wanted to see what wars are like) then life would be miserable for those countries near the war; but if the UN diageed and find some other way that would end this all peacefully without a single fight breaking out.
